- India’s security concerns & Challenges
- Hits: 318
Is the Responsibility to Honour the Peace Agreements Rest only on India's Shoulders ?
It was in 2013 that a 21 day standoff between India and China in the Daulat Beg Oldie sector(DOB) in eastern Ladakh took place, thereafter the next year, the two sides were locked in another standoff in the Chumar sector of Ladakh, then, in 2017, the two countries were involved in a tense standoff in the Doklam region , when Chinese troops started constructing a road and then the Ladakh standoff in 2020.
It appears as if Chinese are observing some sort of ritual every 2-3 years.
These standoffs obviously point a finger at the utility of the peace agreement of 1993 and 1996.
What has changed in last 15 years that China has to resort to all these intrusions.
Is India only responsible to carry the burden of these Agreements ?
If perception of LAC is the major issue of difference then should China not honour India's percpetion.
Why the Intrusions ?
Although, these skirmishes are not new and they have a long history but now the Chinese come prepared for a long haul. But why now, when peace agreements have been signed barely 15 years ago.
One. Is it part of some change in Chinese foreign policy ? (China has been on the diplomatic offensive against many countries; Australia, Philippines etc).
Second, Are they trying to deflect attention of their people from issues inside the country, which have had an adverse impact on the country’s economy ?.
As regards its aggressive policy in South China Sea, one can easily find a reason, But, why against India, where most of the strategic experts and successive Govts considered them to be just a Competitor instead of an enemy or a rival.
If we place ourselves in their position, we would be easily able to comprehend the reasons ;
One. 80 percent of China's energy imports and 39.5 percent of China's total trade passes through the South China Sea. China is a net importer of oil and all its ports are along South China Sea. The world’s 85% trade takes place through seas and so any country whose economic interest grows beyond its frontiers has to make sure that its sea lanes are protected.
Two. In order to avoid being solely dependent on sea routes and as China is a net importer of oil which comes from West Asia, A secured land route from Pakistan is therefore very important. Hence the link from Gwadar port through POK becomes important for China. so, it must ensure , given the bottle necks it passes through, are adequately guarded.
Three. So, all these smaller nations Like Bangladesh, Mynmmar , Srilanka are important as they provide access to Indian Ocean and Pakistan becomes strategically important for its land route to China.
Four. India is the only country in this region that is big enough in terms of resources and size to challenge China. Hence, These small states around India also become important so that India’s influence beyond its shores is marginalized and it is unable to challenge.
So, now the pattern becomes clearer.
First surround India through a string of ports which provide China access to Indian Ocean, so as to reduce India’s dominance in Indian Ocean. There after , marginalise its influence in this region using its deep pockets by buying the poor neighbours to virtual submission. Three, develop a highway to connect everyone, four finally target India’s soft belly ; its long inhospitable borders and keep it busy guarding them.
In these last 20 years or so, China has systematically executed this plan and it is unlikely that it will loosen its grip now and let India regain its position in South Asia. SARRC is virtually dead now.
It’s a catch 22 situation for India, either it lets China into it and lose its supremacy or let this association die its natural death.
China has achieved its political objective by occupying strategically important places to safeguard its interest and proving its hegemony over India by undermining its regional status and also secured the 1959 claim line, without firing a bullet and without any bloodshed, primarily because we could not foresee this happening.
China therefore does not have any motivation or reason to go for war.
Add a comment